Carrasco et al v. Shasta-Cascade Credit Bureaus, Inc.
Plaintiff: Anthony Carrasco and Kimberly Carrasco
Defendant: Shasta-Cascade Credit Bureaus, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv01419
Filed: July 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Shasta
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/8/16 DISCHARGING 27 Order to Show Case but hereby ORDERING Mr. Bacon to SHOW CAUSE within (7) seven days of the issuance of this order why he should not be sanctioned $250.00 for his failure to comply with the court's rules and orders. If he requests an order to show cause hearing, it will be scheduled together with the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/13/16 at 2:30 p.m.(Washington, S)
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/28/16 ORDERING that Within seven (7) days of the date this order is filed, plaintiffs shall SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; the Initial Scheduling Conference set for September 1, 2016 is VACATED and RESET for October 13, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. The parties' joint status report is due no later than seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference. (Becknal, R)
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/16. The claims against defendants Benner and Franklin are dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/19/2016 ORDERING the plaintiffs to show cause within fourteen days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; ALTERNATIVELY ORDERING the plaintiffs to file wi thin fourteen days, a Motion for Default Judgment before the assigned magistrate judge, or otherwise adequately explain the steps they will take to diligently prosecute this action; CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference to 9/1/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; ORDERING the parties to file a joint status report seven (7) days prior to the Initial Scheduling Conference. (Michel, G.)
May 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/3/2016 ORDERING 20 the court GRANTS plaintiffs ex parte application for leave to amend; Plaintiffs shall file the proposed Second Amended Complaint as a separate document on the court's d ocket of this case within 7 days; Initial Scheduling Conference Reset for 7/21/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; a Joint Status Report filed in advance as required by this Court's Scheduling Order and the Local Rules. (Reader, L)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/08/16 ORDERING the initial scheduling conference is VACATED. Within 14 days of the date this order is filed, plaintiffs shall SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Alternatively this order to show cause shall be discharged if, within 14 days, plaintiffs file a motion for default judgment before the assigned magistrate judge. (Jackson, T)
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/14/15: If Plaintiffs do not take whatever steps are necessary to prosecute this action as a default matter by 1/8/16, they shall show cause in a writing filed no later than 1/11/16, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. Status Conference RESET for 5/23/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/20/2015. Plaintiffs are ordered to SHOW CAUSE, in writing to be filed no later than 11/2/2015, why sanctions should not be imposed against them. If an OSC Hearing is requested, it will be held on 12/21/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) just prior to Status Conference rescheduled for this date. A Status Report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrasco et al v. Shasta-Cascade Credit Bureaus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Carrasco
Represented By: Todd M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Carrasco
Represented By: Todd M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shasta-Cascade Credit Bureaus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?