Rogers et al v. Morawcznski et al
| Christie Rogers and Shauna Elder |
| Nicholas Morawcznski and Vishwas Sharma |
| 2:2015cv01420 |
| July 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/4/2017 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety and with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/16/2016 ORDERING that Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 5/22/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 4/7/2017 at 10:00 AM. Joint Pretrial Statements shall be filed 3/31/2017. Expert Witness Disclosures and Rebuttal Expert Witnesses shall be filed no later than 9/16/2016 and 9/23/2016. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/6/15. The parties hereby stipulate that Defendants NICHOLAS MORAWCZNSKI and VISHWAS SHARMA withdraw their Motion to Dismiss that is current scheduled to be heard on November 18, 2015 (Court's Docket No. 4) and Plaintiffs CHRISTIE ROGERS and SHAUNA ELDER will file their First Amended Complaint by November 5, 2015. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
