Johnson v. Ramirez et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Rafael T. Ramirez, Karen K. Ramirez and Cindy Gonzales |
| 2:2015cv01442 |
| July 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/02/16 ORDERING that a Settlement Conference is SET for 8/9/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney; confidential settlement conference statements are due 7 days prior. If the parties are unable to settle this case before the magistrate judge, they shall file a joint status report within 15 days after the settlement conference (cc: CKD). (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/7/16 ORDERING counsel for both parties to show casue, within seven days of entry of this order, why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for failure to comply with this court's order to file a joint status report. Counsel for both parties are to file, within seven days of entry of this order, a joint status report advising the court whether they have reached settlement or exhausted their efforts to settle. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
