Emmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Sean Michael Emmons |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2015cv01509 |
| July 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER for Attnorney's fees under the equal access to justice signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/17/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/29/2016 GRANTING Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING Commissioner's 17 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/04/16 ORDERING that the date for defendant to reply to the 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 02/22/16. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/15/15: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
