Wright v. CFMG, Inc. et al
Richerd Wright |
CFMG, Inc. and Solano County Jail |
2:2015cv01652 |
August 3, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/1/2015. Since plaintiff has not filed a Second Amended Complaint or otherwise responded to Court's 12 Order, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Richerd Wright signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/25/2015. The Sheriff shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forw ard to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Solano County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/20/2015 DISREGARDING plaintiff's complaint and 2 application to proceed IFP, plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint and ifp application; plaintiff's 3 motion for appointment of a guardian ad litem is DENIED; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff Wright a form for a civil rights complaint and an ifp application. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.