Allianz Sigorta, S.A. v. Ameritech Industries Inc., et al
| Allianz Sigorta, S.A. |
| Ameritech Industries, Inc. and Eagle Engines |
| 2:2015cv01665 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/18/19 ORDERING that this action is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/6/2018 DENYING 98 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 100 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
97
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/27/17: The last day for hearing dispositive motions shall be February 22, 2018. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 84 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/13/17. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM and signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/15/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 50 is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file its First Amended Complaint not later than ten (10) days from the date of electronic filing of this Order. Defendant's MOTION for 115-Day Extension of Time with regard to thediscovery cutoff, 51 is GRANTED. Discovery shall be reopened for 115 days from the date of electronic filing of this order for the limited purposes of (a) obtaining a ruling on Defendant's MOTION to Compel production of the subject engine, and to obtain any discovery ordered by such a ruling; and (b) allowing discovery into Plaintiff's newly added claims in the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's MSJt and MIL, 63 and 70 all related filings, are STRIKEN without prejudice. The parties are directed to confer and to provide the Court with a stipu lation and proposed order (or, alternatively, a motion to amend the PTSO) regarding a new deadline for filing dispositive motions not later than twenty (20) days after receiving a ruling on Defendant's MOTION to Compel. All outstanding trial and pretrial dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/12/16 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to COMPEL 33 , 34 , and 43 is DENIED, without prejudice, as untimely; The MOTION is also DENIED, without prejudice, for the further reason that it fails to comply with Local Rule 251 (a); and The 8/10/16 hearing is VACATED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/2/2016 DENYING 27 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, without prejudice to its renewal after the parties have complied with the Court's instructions. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
