Straits v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility, et al.
Scot Straits |
Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility and Sacramento Sheriff's Health Services Unit |
2:2015cv01668 |
August 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K) |
Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Scot Straits signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/13/17. The Sacramento County Sheriff shall collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Plummer, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/10/15 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the required trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may result dismissal of this case. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.