Pickern v. Alvarez, et al
| Brenda Pickern |
| Paul Alvarez and Plumas Pines Partners, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01671 |
| August 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| William B. Shubb |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER for Dismissal 19 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/16/2016. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
12
AMENDED ORDER SETTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/25/15: The court previously determined that this case is appropriate for an early settlement conference (Docket No. 9). The conference will b e conducted by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The parties shall contact Judge Claire's courtroom deputy no later than 12/14/2015, by phone or email to schedule an early settlement conference. The early settlement conference shall be conduc ted no later than 1/20/2016. Each party is ordered to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the conference or be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. No later than seven days before the date of the settlement conf erence, counsel for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference Statement to the settlement judge. Such statements shall not be filed, but shall be emailed to ACorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Upon emailing the Settlement Con ference Statement, each party shall e-file a one page document entitled "Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement." To avoid the unnecessary expenditure of costs and attorneys' fees, this action is hereby s tayed pending conclusion of the early settlement conference. No later than five days after the settlement conference, the parties shall file a joint statement indicating whether a settlement was reached. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference remains set for Tuesday, 2/16/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. If a settlement is not reached at the early settlement conference, the parties shall submit an Amended Joint Status Report no later than 2/2/2016. cc: USMJ: Claire. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER SETTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/16/15 ORDERING that this matter shall be set for an early settlement conference; the parties are to contact the assigned magistrate judge's courtr oom deputy by 12/14/15 for scheduling a conference to take place by 01/11/16. Seven days prior to the settlement conference, counsel shall submit confidential settlement conference statements to the settlement judge and shall file a waiver of disqua lification of the assigned magistrate judge. Absent the filing of a waiver, the settlement conference will be reassigned to another magistrate judge. No later than 5 days after the settlement conference, the parties shall file a joint statement ind icating whether a settlement was reached. This matter is STAYED pending conclusion of the settlement conference. The Initial Scheduling Conference is RESET for 2/16/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb with an amended joint status report due 02/02/16. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
