Microsoft Corporation v. DSD Solutions Inc., a California corporation et al
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: DSD Solutions Inc., a California corporation and Duy L. Pan
Case Number: 2:2015cv01690
Filed: August 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/16/2017 DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to the 32 Stipulation for Dismissal; ORDERING each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs; ORDERING that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the Permanent Injunction and the Settlement Agreement between the parties. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JOINT NOTICE of SETTLEMENT and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/25/2017 ORDERING that the parties have 21 days within which to file the documents disposing of the action and that all pending deadlines, hearings, and trial dates, including the settlement conference scheduled for 2/9/2017, is VACATED. (Jackson, T)
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/15/2016 ORDERING that a Settlement Conference is set for 2/2/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. (Reader, L)
August 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/11/16 ORDERING that the Court hereby adopts the parties' stipulation as its order. Judge Gregory G. Hollows has been randomly assigned to conduct a settlement conference in this cas e. Despite the parties' general request for a November status conference date, the Court declines to set that conference now. Instead, not later than seven (7) days following the date that this order is electronically filed, Counsel are directe d to contact Judge Hollows chambers to schedule that conference directly. Not later than one week prior to the settlement conference, counsel for each party shall submit to the chambers of Judge Hollows a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. (Becknal, R)
June 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/22/2016 ORDERING that Defendants are hereby given until 9/9/2016, to complete the depositions beyond the Fact Discovery Cut-Off; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is hereby given until 9/9/2016, to conduct up to three additional depositions beyond the Fact Discovery Cut-Off. (Reader, L)
April 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/13/2016. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/12/16, ORDERING that the Discovery cut-off is 7/8/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/15/2016, and expert rebuttal disclosures due by 8/12/2016. Dispositive Motion hearing cut-off is 11/18/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/25/16, ORDERING that the Discovery cut-off date is CONTINUED to 5/25/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 12/10/15 ORDERING that all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 4/4/2016. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/3/2016. The last da y to hear dispositive motions shall be 9/29/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/16/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. The parties shall file, not later than 1/26/2017, a Joint Final Pretria l Conference Statement. The parties shall file trial briefs not later than 2/2/2017. Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 1/26/2017. Oppositions must be filed by 2/2/2017, and any reply must be filed by 2/9/2017. A Jury Trial is SET for 4/3/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. DSD Solutions Inc., a California corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Audra M. Mori
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DSD Solutions Inc., a California corporation
Represented By: Stephen Douglas Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duy L. Pan
Represented By: Stephen Douglas Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?