Candler v. Stainer et al
Keith Candler |
M Stainer, J. Macomber, Reames, Johnson, Macias, Sherburn and Garrett |
2:2015cv01786 |
August 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/14/2017 ORDERING Defendants to file responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint within 14 days after the 7/26/2017 Settlement Conference, if a responsive pleading remains necessary. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/8/15 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the required trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may result dismissal of this case. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/1/15 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date of service of this order to submit eitherthe filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.