Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Delaney, et al
| Sergei Portnoy - VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
| Carolyn K. Delaney, Lawrence K. Karlton, Richard C. Tallman, Richard R. Clifton, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Edmund F. Brennan, Frank C. Damrell, Dale A. Drozd, Garland E. Burrell, Jr., Gregory G. Hollows, Morrison C. England, Jr., Kimberly J. Mueller, David F. Levi and Martin J. Jenkins |
| 2:2015cv01839 |
| September 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/10/16 ORDERING that, this matter was referred by the 10 USCA for the limited purpose of determining whether IFP status should continue for Appellant's appeal; the court finds the claims are without merit and the appeal is frivolous; the Court REVOKES Appellant's IFP status (cc: USCA). (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/15/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Matter referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
