Ribeiro-Sunglow LLC, et al v. Umpqua Bank
Plaintiff: Ribeiro-Sunglow, LLC and Ribeiro California II, LLC
Defendant: Umpqua Bank
Case Number: 2:2015cv01853
Filed: September 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER Dismissing Complaint and Counterclaim With Prejudice signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/6/17. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/17 ORDERING that Designation of Expert Witnesses due 6/13/2017, Supplemental Expert Disclosure due 6/27/2017, Joint Mid-Litigaiton Statement to be filed by 6/27/2017, All Disco very to be Completed by 7/11/2017, Dispositive Motions to be filed by 8/22/2017, Date for Hearing on all Dispositive Motions is 9/19/2017 at 1:30 p.m., Joint Pretrial Statement to be filed by 10/27/2017. Final Pretrial Conference SET for 11/3/2017 at 10:00 AM, and Trial SET for 1/8/2018 at 09:00 AM, BOTH in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
September 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/12/2016 ORDERING Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 2/13/2017, Supplemental Expert Disclosure by 2/27/2017; Joint Mid-Litigation Statement by 2/27/2017; Discovery due by 3/6/2017; Dispositive Mot ions filed by 4/18/2017, Date for hearing on all dispositive motions for 5/16/2017 at 1:30; Joint Pretrial Statement by 6/30/2017; Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; and Court Trial set for 8/28/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez.(Reader, L)
August 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/8/2016 ORDERING that the parties shall make expert witness disclosures no later than 9/16/2016, and that any supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal shall be made by 9/23/2016. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ribeiro-Sunglow LLC, et al v. Umpqua Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ribeiro-Sunglow, LLC
Represented By: James Joseph Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ribeiro California II, LLC
Represented By: James Joseph Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Umpqua Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?