Thomas v. Sacramento County et al
| Earl Thomas |
| Sacramento County, Scott R. Jones, S. Daniels, Fidler, Corpral McKersey, Serg Kerez, Ares Management, LLC and 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01952 |
| September 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/28/2019 ORDERING the deadlines RESET as follows: Discovery due by 9/25/2019, Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/22/2019, with Expert Rebuttal due by 12/13/2019, Dispositive Mo tions to be heard by 5/14/2020, Joint Pretrial Conference Statement due by 7/16/2020. The Pretrial Conference is reset for 7/23/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley, and Trial is reset for 9/28/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
55
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/2018 ORDERING the following deadline and trial dates CONTINUED: Fact discovery cut-off 4/26/2019; Expert disclosure 6/28/2019; Expert rebuttal 7/18/2019; Hearing of dispositive mot ions 12/5/2019; Joint pretrial conference statement 2/13/2020; Pretrial Conference CONTINUED to 2/20/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; Jury Trial CONTINUED to 4/27/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/28/18 CONTINUING dates as follows: all Discovery shall be completed by 01/25/19; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 03/29/19, expert rebuttal due 04/18/19 and expert discovery c ut-off 05/17/19; Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 09/05/19; Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/14/19 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley with a joint pretrial statement due 11/07/19; Jury Trial set for 01/27/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley with trial briefs due 01/13/2020. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/24/17 ORDERING that Non-Government Defendants shall file their answers to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by 04/17/17. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/20/17: County Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before April 17, 2017.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/9/2017 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 16 Motion to Dismiss; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/15 ORDERING that the hearing for Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS 16 is SET for 2/11/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley with Plaintiff's opposition due on 1/28/16, and Defendants' reply due on 2/4/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/15/15 ORDERING that defendants have until 11/6/2015 to file and their responsive pleading. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
