Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
| Mid-Century Insurance Company |
| Electrolux Home Products, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv02089 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Morrison C. England |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/3/2017 ORDERING that all claims in this action are hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice, against all Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
18
SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/28/17 ORDERING Not later than 5/6/17, any party may designate a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered b y an expert designated by an adverse party. The right to designate a supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes only shall apply to a party who has not previously disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness disclosure by this Order ; The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be 6/27/17. The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. This Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the Court unless objections are filed within seven (7) days from the date of this Order.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/7/2016 ORDERING the date for the completion of Non-Expert Discovery CONTINUED to 1/27/2017; Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 2/6/2017; Supplemental Expert Disclosure by 3/6/2017; Discovery Motions by 3/15/2017; the last day to hear dispositive motions shall be 6/27/2017.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/16/16 ORDERING that the Settlement Conference currently scheduled for 6/27/16 is CONTINUED to 8/26/2016 before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/4/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mid-Century Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Dean A. Alper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Electrolux Home Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Marie Biernat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
