Cross Check Services, LLC v. Old Republic Insurance Company
| Cross Check Services, LLC |
| Old Republic Insurance Company |
| 2:2015cv02113 |
| October 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/2019 GRANTING 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment Entered in Favor of Old Republic Insurance Company. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 02/15/18 ORDERING that by 02/28/18, the parties will file their joint exhibit list and joint statement of undisputed facts; by 03/15/18, each party will file and serve by email its opening brief and by 03/30/18 each party will file and serve by email its responding brief. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER re Trial Readiness signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/29/17. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/19/2017 ORDERING 11 that the facts are estiblished for this litigation as read in this order; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when Judgment is entered in this action, Judgment be entered in Old Republic's favor and against Cross Check on Cross Check's claim for the Attorneys' Fees Award. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/21/16 ORDERING that the parties will engage in alternative dispute resolution proceedings on or before 2/15/17. The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report up dating the Court as to the status and/or outcome of those proceedings on or before 3/1/17. That the Discovery completion date, with the exception of expert discovery, be continued from 11/14/16 to 4/21/2017. That the expert disclosure date be co ntinued from 1/13/17 to 3/31/2017. That the hearing date on Nationwide's MOTION for partial Summary Judgment [Dkt. 11 ] be CONTINUED from 12/1/16 to 5/18/17, and that the filing deadlines set forth in the Pretrial Scheduling Order [Dkt. 9 ] be calculated from the new hearing date. That the last date to hear dispositive Motions be CONTINUED from 5/18/17 to 7/27/2017.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cross Check Services, LLC v. Old Republic Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cross Check Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Douglas R. Alliston |
| Represented By: | Louis A. Basile |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Old Republic Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
