Cuaresma, Jr. v. Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan et al
Narciso Cuaresma, Jr. |
Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
2:2015cv02192 |
October 21, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/9/2019 ORDERING that this action shall be, and hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety as to all claims and parties. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S) Modified on 5/10/2019 (Washington, S). |
Filing 50 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/19 ADOPTING the following briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney's Fees: 3/28/19 - Meet & Confer; 4/16/19 Plaintiff's last day to file his moving papers in support of Motion for Attorney's Fees; 5/7/19 - Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Attorney's Fees due; 5/16/19 - Plaintiff's Reply re Motion for Attorney's Fees due; 5/21/19 - Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees at 1:30 p.m. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 48 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 07/09/18 ORDERING that this case is REMANDED to Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston to fully evaluate the merits of Cuaresma's claim for LTD benefits in compliance with the Policy, and to decide whether Cuaresma is entitled to LTD benefits under the Plan; and that, instead of entering final judgment, the District Court shall RETAIN jurisdiction while this matter is on remand. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 40 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/20/2017 ORDERING that 29 Bill of Costs Submitted, 33 Costs Taxed are hereby SET ASIDE, without prejudice to Defendants' right to recover the same costs taxed or additional costs. No party shall recover costs at this time. DENYING as MOOT 34 Motion to Strike and the hearing thereon, currently set for 2/7/2017, is vacated. (Washington, S) |
Filing 38 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/27/2016 ORDERING the following briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Strike Bill of Costs and is hereby ADOPTED: 1/24/2017: Last Day to File Defendants' Opposition to Motion; 1/31/2017: Last Day to File Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion; Hearing CONTINUED to 2/7/2017 at 1:30 p.m in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 28 JUDGMENT dated *10/19/16* in favor of Defendants pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/19/16. CASE CLOSED.(Washington, S) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/18/2016 GRANTING on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies forthe reasons stated at the hearing on Defendants' 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/02/16 ORDERING that the briefing schedule on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment and the 11/01/16 trial date is VACATED. The parties shall appear for a Case Management Conference on 9/6/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez to be held concurrent and contemporaneous with the hearing on defendants' 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/5/2016 ORDERING the defendants to file their Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2016; ORDERING the plaintiff to file an opposition to the 12 Motion for Summary Judgment by 8/9/2016; ORDERING that any reply be filed by 8/23/2016; CONFIRMING the hearing on 12 Motion for Summary Judgment SET for 9/6/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.