Cuaresma, Jr. v. Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan et al
Plaintiff: Narciso Cuaresma, Jr.
Defendant: Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Case Number: 2:2015cv02192
Filed: October 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/9/2019 ORDERING that this action shall be, and hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety as to all claims and parties. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S) Modified on 5/10/2019 (Washington, S).
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/19 ADOPTING the following briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney's Fees: 3/28/19 - Meet & Confer; 4/16/19 Plaintiff's last day to file his moving papers in support of Motion for Attorney's Fees; 5/7/19 - Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Attorney's Fees due; 5/16/19 - Plaintiff's Reply re Motion for Attorney's Fees due; 5/21/19 - Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees at 1:30 p.m. (Becknal, R)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 07/09/18 ORDERING that this case is REMANDED to Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston to fully evaluate the merits of Cuaresma's claim for LTD benefits in compliance with the Policy, and to decide whether Cuaresma is entitled to LTD benefits under the Plan; and that, instead of entering final judgment, the District Court shall RETAIN jurisdiction while this matter is on remand. (Benson, A.)
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/20/2017 ORDERING that 29 Bill of Costs Submitted, 33 Costs Taxed are hereby SET ASIDE, without prejudice to Defendants' right to recover the same costs taxed or additional costs. No party shall recover costs at this time. DENYING as MOOT 34 Motion to Strike and the hearing thereon, currently set for 2/7/2017, is vacated. (Washington, S)
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/27/2016 ORDERING the following briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Strike Bill of Costs and is hereby ADOPTED: 1/24/2017: Last Day to File Defendants' Opposition to Motion; 1/31/2017: Last Day to File Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion; Hearing CONTINUED to 2/7/2017 at 1:30 p.m in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Jackson, T)
October 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 JUDGMENT dated *10/19/16* in favor of Defendants pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/19/16. CASE CLOSED.(Washington, S)
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/18/2016 GRANTING on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies forthe reasons stated at the hearing on Defendants' 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Jackson, T)
September 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/02/16 ORDERING that the briefing schedule on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment and the 11/01/16 trial date is VACATED. The parties shall appear for a Case Management Conference on 9/6/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez to be held concurrent and contemporaneous with the hearing on defendants' 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A)
August 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/5/2016 ORDERING the defendants to file their Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2016; ORDERING the plaintiff to file an opposition to the 12 Motion for Summary Judgment by 8/9/2016; ORDERING that any reply be filed by 8/23/2016; CONFIRMING the hearing on 12 Motion for Summary Judgment SET for 9/6/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cuaresma, Jr. v. Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Narciso Cuaresma, Jr.
Represented By: David J. Linden
Represented By: Laurence Padway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan
Represented By: Robert Mario Forni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Represented By: Robert Mario Forni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?