Capital Mailing Services, Inc. v. Salt Creek Media, Inc., et al.
| Capital Mailing Services, Inc. |
| Salt Creek Media, Inc., Andrew Cody, Matthew Kelsoe, Robert Rico, Joshua Byrd, APC Holding & Management, Inc. and Perice D Sibley |
| Andrew Cody |
| Capital Mailing Services, Inc., APC Holding & Management, Inc. and Perice D Sibley |
| 2:2015cv02337 |
| November 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/11/2016 ORDERING that the Court hereby GRANTS the 50 motion for withdrawal of counsel and further orders a STAY for a period of 60 days to allow Plaintiff to designate new counsel. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/8/2016 GRANTING 31 Notice of Request to Seal. Exhibits 5-7 to Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Counter-Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Andrew Cody's Counterclaims are ordered SEALED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 7 Motion for TRO signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/15. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
