Fristoe v. Anata Management Solutions, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Holly Fristoe
Defendant: Anata Management Solutions, LLC, United States and Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 2:2015cv02460
Filed: November 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/19/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 23 motion to prevent the U.S. Department of Justice from representing the IRS and to require the IRS to secure other cou nsel is DENIED. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's 5 motion for summary judgment, construed as a motion for default judgment, be denied; Anata Management Solutions' 9 motion to dismiss be granted; The United States' 20 mot ion to dismiss be granted; The Clerk be directed to close this case. Matter referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/1/2016 GRANTING 26 Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a sur-reply to the Government's motion to dismiss; Plaintiff shall file a sur-reply within 14 days of this order; the government may file a response to the sur-reply within 7 days thereafter; and Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply is VACATED from this court's calendar for 6/14/2016. (Reader, L)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/29/16 ORDERING that the deadline for defendants United States of America, Internal Revenue Service to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED 60 days to 03/25/16. (Benson, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fristoe v. Anata Management Solutions, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly Fristoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anata Management Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Nicholas Robert Kloeppel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?