Donney v. Beard et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Donney
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard and Brian Duffy
Case Number: 2:2015cv02530
Filed: December 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER adopting 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/14/17. (Kaminski, H)
July 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/2017 RECOMMENDING defendants' 27 motion for summary judgment be granted, judgment be entered in defendants' favor, and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/29/16 ORDERING that On or before August 5, 2016, the parties shall file status reports (see order for further details). The parties are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers im mediately of any settlement or other disposition. The parties may consent to have this case before the assigned magistrate judge for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on the parties the Notice of Availability of a Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction. All parties shall complete and execute the form and file it with the Clerk.(Dillon, M)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/20/16 ADOPTING IN FULL 18 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Jackson, T)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/17/16 RECOMMENDING that defendants January 8, 2016 motion todismiss (ECF No. 8 ) be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/3/16 ORDERING that the time for Defendants to file their Reply tothe Motion to Dismiss be extended to February 5, 2016.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donney v. Beard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Donney
Represented By: Alfredo Vargas, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard
Represented By: Kelli Marie Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Duffy
Represented By: Kelli Marie Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?