Fredericks v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Edwards Erin Fredericks |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2015cv02548 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/15/2017 ORDERING that Edward Erin Fredericks be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,600 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/31/16 ORDERING that Defendant shall show cause, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file a cross-motion for summary judgment. Defendant shall file her cross-motion for summary judgment within 14 days of the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/8/16 ORDERING that the new date for Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment will be Wednesday 8/24/2016. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/1/16 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 45 days tofile her motion for summary judgment. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/14/15 granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of the court is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order and Order re: Consent or Requ est for reassignment for social security cases. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the U.S. Marshal a completed summons, a compl eted USM-285 form, sufficient copies of the summons and complaint for service of process and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve process and copies of the undersigned's Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Copy of this order served on US Marshal) (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fredericks v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwards Erin Fredericks | |
| Represented By: | Brian C. Shapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey T. Chen |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
