Tye v. Global Travel International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mary E Tye
Defendant: Global Travel International, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv02654
Filed: December 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/12/17 ORDERING that the Settlement Conference set for 2/7/17 is VACATED and RESET for 3/21/2017 at 09:30 AM. Settlement Conference Statements are due no later than 7 days prior.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/4/16 ORDERING cases 2:16-cv-1821-JAM-CKD and 2:15-cv-2654-KJM-AC are related. The caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:16-cv-1821-KJM-AC and 2:15-cv-2654-KJM-AC. (Washington, S)
August 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/9/16 ORDERING that the stipulation and proposed order (ECF No. 20), is NOT APPROVED.(Becknal, R)
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/19/16 ORDERING that the court GRANTS nunc pro tunc defendants 18 motion to extend the deadline to respond to the complaint until 7/7/2016. The court deems defendant's 17 answer to be filed. (Kastilahn, A)
July 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/5/2016 DENYING 15 Third Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. (Jackson, T)
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/20/16: 13 Stipulation and Proposed Order is NOT APPROVED. (Kaminski, H)
June 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/2016 GRANTING Stipulation to extend time to respond to the complaint and to continue the status conference; the new deadline for defendant to file a response to the complaint is set for 7/1/2016; the Status Conference is Reset for 8/18/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.(Reader, L)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/26/16: The new deadline for Defendant to file a response to the Complaint is June 1, 2016 Initial Scheduling Conference RESET for 7/7/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tye v. Global Travel International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary E Tye
Represented By: Patrick D. Toole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Global Travel International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?