Carter v. Yates
Darlice Carter |
Jahman Yates |
2:2015cv02679 |
December 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
John A. Mendez |
Kendall J. Newman |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/27/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's "Motion for hearing before Senior Judge" 10 is DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/08/16 ORDERING that the 7 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A) |
Filing 7 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/4/16: By no later than June 2, 2016, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and failure to comply with the court's order of January 4, 2016 (ECF No. 3). On or before June 2, 2016, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/01/2016 DISCHARGING 4 Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, BUT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall file either (a) a second amende d complaint in accordance with the requirements of this order or (b) a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. Failure to file either a second amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline may result in the imposition of sanctions, including potential recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). (Jackson, T) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/4/2016 ORDERING no later than 4/7/2016, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiffs failure to prosecute the action and failure to co mply with the court's order of 3 ; On or before 4/7/2016, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that addresses the issues raised in the court's screening order entered on 1/4/2016; Plaintiffs' failure to file the required writing and amended complaint shall constitute an additional ground for, and plaintiffs' consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiffs' case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a). (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/04/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; the complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND within 28 days. (Benson, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carter v. Yates | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darlice Carter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jahman Yates | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.