Hendrix v. Health and Social Services of Solano County et al
Plaintiff: Steven Hendrix
Defendant: Health and Social Services of Solano County, Gerald Huber, Aaron Crutison, Cameo Motley, Erica Mitchell, Melissa Martel, Suzanne Kiesz and Brandy Moore
Case Number: 2:2015cv02689
Filed: December 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/27/2018 ADOPTING the 73 findings and recommendations. Defendants' 58 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. All claims against defendant Gerald Huber are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claim, and state law claims against defendants County of Solano, Erica Mitchell, and Cameo Motley are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Defendants' 58 motion to strike is DENIED. This action proceed on plaintiff's § 1983 claims for violation of the First and Fourth Amendments against defendants County of Solano, Mitchell, and Motley. (Zignago, K.)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/2018 RECOMMENDING that: the 58 Motion to Dismiss be granted; All claims against defendant Gerald Huber be dismissed without leave to amend; Plaintiff's sixth a nd fourteenth amendment claims against County of Solano, Erica Mitchell, and Cameo Motley be dismissed without leave to amend; Defendants' 58 Motion to Strike be denied; and that this action will proceed on plaintiff's claims of first and fourth amendment violations against defendants Counsel of Solano, Mitchell and Motley. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Donati, J)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/28/2017 ADOPTING 52 Findings and Recommendations; GRNATING 44 Motion to Dismiss certain defendants and defendants Crutison, Kiesz, and Moore are DISMISSED; GRANTING 35 Motion to Dismiss ; Plaintiff's first amended complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend, as provided in the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint. (Washington, S)
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2017 RECOMMENDING: that Plaintiff's 44 Motion to dismiss certain defendants, construed as a motion to amend the complaint, be granted and defendants Crutison, Ki esz, and Moore be dismissed; that Defendant's 35 Motion to Dismiss the first amended complaint be granted; Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be dismissed with leave to amend, as provided herein; and that Plaintiff be granted 30 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendation to file a second amended complaint. Objections due within 14 day after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Donati, J)
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/31/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 31 request to file electronically. (Zignago, K.)
October 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/6/2016 ORDERING that defendants' request is GRANTED and defendants' responsive pleading is due on 10/17/2016. (Reader, L)
September 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/8/2016 DISREGARDING 24 Request for production of employment files. (Michel, G.)
May 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/31/2016 ORDERING that the status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for 6/1/2016 is CONTINUED to 7/13/2016. On or before 6/29/2016, plaintiff shall file a status report addressing the issues raised in the 12/29/2015 4 order. On or before 6/29/2016, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why sanctions, including dismissal of this action, should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the 12/29/2015 order and/or prosecute this case. The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on County Counsel for Solano County at the following address: County Counsel, 675 Texas Street, Suite 6600, Fairfield, CA 9453. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hendrix v. Health and Social Services of Solano County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Health and Social Services of Solano County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald Huber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Crutison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cameo Motley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erica Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suzanne Kiesz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandy Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?