Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company et al.
| Aguilar, Andres Aguilar and Rosalinda Sanchez |
| Ford Motor Company and Hertz Corporation |
| 2:2016cv00051 |
| January 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A Mendez |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/7/2016 ORDERING that the entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and each party shall bear their own fees and costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL of action with prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Andres Aguilar, Rosalinda Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Le Pere, Jeffrey) Modified on 9/8/2016 (Michel, G.). |
|
Filing 14
STATUS (Pre-trial Scheduling) ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/01/2016 ORDERING: Discovery shall be completed by 12/16/2016; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/21/2016; Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 1/24/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/31/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial set for 5/8/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Jackson, T)
|
| Filing 13 Ford Motor Company's Initial Disclosures (F.R.C.P. 26) by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A through C)(Harlow, Charles) Modified on 4/4/2016 (Jackson, T). |
| Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Andres Aguilar, Rosalinda Sanchez. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Hertz Corporation. (Williams, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER with Jury Demand by The Hertz Corporation. Attorney Williams, Jennifer Lynn added.(Williams, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Ford Motor Company served on 1/27/2016, answer due 2/17/2016. (Le Pere, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE and Certification of Interested Parties by Ford Motor Company. (Dye, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT of Initial Disclosure by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Dye, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Dye, Stephen H. added.(Dye, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by The Hertz Corporation. Attorney Galvin, Jeffrey S. added. (Galvin, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Hallen D. Rosner on behalf of Andres Aguilar. Attorney Rosner, Hallen D. added. (Rosner, Hallen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Jackson, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Ford Motor Company, The Hertz Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jeffrey L. Le Pere* *Rosner, Barry & Babbitt LLP* *10085 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 100* *San Diego, CA 92131*. (Jackson, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Andres Aguilar and Rosalinda Sanchez. Attorney Le Pere, Jeffrey L. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-6256189) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties)(Le Pere, Jeffrey) Modified on 1/11/2016 (Jackson, T). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
