Motley v. Unknown
| Ernest E. Motley |
| Unknown |
| 2:2016cv00059 |
| January 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Monterey |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/14/2019 RECOMMENDING petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2017 GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Respondent to have up to an including 7/31/2017 to file response to petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/31/2017 ORDERING that the 25 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Respondent's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to claims one and five, and DENIED as to claims two, three and four; respondent shall file an answer addressing claims two, three and four within thirty days of the date of this order; petitioner may file a reply to the answer within thirty days thereafter. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/15/17 RECOMMENDING that respondents motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10 ) be granted as to claims one and five, and denied as to claims two, three and four; respondent be ordered to file an answer addressing claims two, three and four within 30 days of the adoption of these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/04/16 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file the further briefing described above; within 14 days thereafter, respondent may file a reply to petitioner's further briefing. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/16 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Motley v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ernest E. Motley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
