Subido v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Nicholaus Mateo Thompson Subido |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv00079 |
| January 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/31/2021 GRANTING 41 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel is awarded fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b) in the amount of $8,599.62. The Commissioner of Social Security shall pay to Plai ntiff's counsel the amount of $2,599.62, such amount reflecting $6,000.00 already paid to counsel by the Commissioner out of total past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff and previously withheld, to the extent such benefits have not already been paid to Plaintiff. Counsel shall reimburse to Plaintiff $4,000.00 previously paid to counsel under the EAJA. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/26/2019 GRANTING 38 Motion for Extension. Counsel may file his motion for attorney's fees within 60 days of the date of this order. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/2018 GRANTING 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees; Defendant to pay plaintiff $4,000, under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/22/17 Recommending that Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 17 be granted. Defendant's CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 be denied; And This matter be remanded for further proceedings re 1 Social Security Complaint. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these Findings and Recommendations due within 14 days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/30/2017 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to Randomly assign a District Judge to this case. Judge Troy L. Nunley randomly assigned to case. New case number: 2:16-cv-00079 TLN CMK (SS). (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/16/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to inform the court regarding consent to M agistrate Judge jurisdiction, as required by the court's scheduling order. Submission of a completed consent election form shall constitute a sufficient response. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the court's form entitled "Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment." (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/30/2016 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Reply Brief re 17 Motion for Summary Judgment by 11/22/2016; DEEMING the 26 Reply Brief timely filed. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/27/2016 ORDERING that Defendants time to file her cross-motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 10/28/2016. (Butolph, J)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/14/2016 ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by 10/14/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/20/2016 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/25/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/8/2016 ORDERING that the 7 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/23/2016. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing and within 30 days of date of this Order, why action should not be dismissing for failure to submit service documents U.S. Marshal. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/20/16: Request to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Subido v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Asim Modi, GOVT(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholaus Mateo Thompson Subido | |
| Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
