Soares v. State of California, Department of Industrial Relations; et al
Ana Maria Soares |
State of California, Department of Industrial Relations and Terry Menafee |
2:2016cv00128 |
January 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
William B. Shubb |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/20/2017 DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to a Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/23/2016 DENYING 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/27/16 GRANTING Defendants' 10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has 20 days from the date this Order is signed to file a Second Amended Complaint, if she can do so consistent with this Order. (Jackson, T) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/25/2016 DENYING plaintiff's request for telephonic appearance for defendants' motion to dismiss. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER 12 for continuance signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/29/2016. Status Conference is RE-SET for 8/1/2016 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS). (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.