Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| Kirell Francis Taylor |
| R. Wade and Internal Revenue Service |
| 2:2016cv00140 |
| January 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/01/16 ordering this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/10/16 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition filed in this case together with a copy of these findings and recommendations on the Attorney General of the State of California, and assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that Petitioner's application for a writ of mandate be summarily dismissed. This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Any future filings shall bear the new case number 2:16-0140-TLN-GGH (HC). Matter referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
