Wilson v. Fox et al
| Fred Wilson |
| Robert Fox, M. Collins, Joseph Bick, N. Saukhla, S. Jensen, R Sanders, Omar, M. Ditomas and J. Lewis |
| 2:2016cv00219 |
| February 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/07/19 RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 35 be granted, and judgment be entered in favor of defendants. This case be closed. Motion for Summary Judgment 35 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/9/2019 GRANTING 39 Motion for a Continuance and CONTINUING the 35 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing to 2/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff shall file a response to 35 Motion for Summary Judgment no later than 2/6/2019. Failure to file a response will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/3/2019 ORDERING the 35 Motion for Summary Judgment CONTINUED to 2/6/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment no later than 1/23/2019. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER adopting in full 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. All of plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas, and Jenden and his § 1985 and § 1986 claims against defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Within 21 days of the filing of this order, defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders shall respond to the first amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the court is directed to strike the second amended complaint 29 from the record. Defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders will be requi red to respond to the first amended complaint 25 as set forth above in Section III.A. Their response shall be due 21 days after the U.S. District Judge assigned to this case rules on the findings and recommendations. Also, RECOMMENDING that all o f plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas, and Jenden and his section 1985 and 1986 claims against defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/06/17 ORDERING plaintiff shall have 30 days from the service of this order to file a second amended complaint as outline in the 11/17/17 screening order. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2017 ORDERING all of plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas and Jenden, and his § 1985 and § 1986 claims against defendants Saukhla, Osman and Sanders are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff has the option to proceed immediately on his deliberate indifference claims against defendants defendants Saukhla, Osman and Sanders as set forth in Section I.A above, or to amend the complaint. Withi n 14 days, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court on how he wants to proceed. The deadlines set forth in the 10/25/2017 discovery and scheduling order are VACATED and discovery is STAYED pending issuance of a new discovery and scheduling order.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/12/2017 GRANTING 11 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas, Jensen, and Lewis are dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has the option to proceed immediately on his medical indifference claims against defendants Saukhla, Omar, and Sanders as set forth in Section IV.C, or to amend the complaint. Within 14 days of service of this order, plaintiff to complete and return attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or whether he wants to file a first amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/6/2016 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 2 motion to proceed IFP; within 30 days, plaintiff must either pay the filing fee in full or submit a non-prisoner application to proceed ifp; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff a blank ifp application used by non-prisoners. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO United States District Court, Eastern District of California, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/3/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016) [Transferred from cand on 2/4/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
