Malifrando v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al.
Plaintiff: Frank Malifrando
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and Long Beach Mortgage Company
Case Number: 2:2016cv00223
Filed: February 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/21/2017 ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause is SATISFIED. The plaintiff's motion to add Duetsche Bank as a party to the action is DENIED. This action will proceed solely on the RESPA i ssue and no further amendment will be allowed. Defendant Real Time's Answer to the surviving RESPA claim, found at paragraphs 48 through 54, is ADOPTED as a final Answer to the complaint. The parties shall meet and confer regarding discovery s cheduling within 30 days of service of this Order. Within 30 days of that meeting, or 60 days from the service of this Order, the parties shall submit a joint scheduling statement that addresses the elements found in Eastern District of California Local Rule No. 240 after which a Scheduling Conference may be set. (Zignago, K.)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/26/2017 DENYING the 35 , 40 Motions to Amend the Complaint; ORDERING the plaintiff to show cause by 6/15/2017, why this action should not be dismissed as being based on a completely inaccurate premise. (Michel, G.)
March 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/23/2017 ADOPTING 33 Findings and Recommendations in Full and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 20 Motion to Dismiss. The Fraud and Misrepresentation claims are DISMISSED. Within 30 days of this order, Defendant Real Time is DIRECTED to file an answer to the RESPA claim as narrowly defined in the findings and recommendations. Defendant Long Beach Mortgage Company is DISMISSED. (Donati, J)
March 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/10/17. In light of the pendency of the 11/19/16 Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff's Motion will be vacated from the court's calendar to be re-calendared, or other appropriate action can taken, after the District Court issues its order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/26/16 ORDERING that Defendant Real Time Resolution Inc.'s 22 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendant Real Time Resol ution Inc.'s 20 motion to dismiss the first amended complaint be granted in part and denied in part; the fraud and misrepresentation claims be dismissed; within 30 days of an order adopting these findings and recommendations, defendant Real Time be directed to file an answer to the RESPA claim as narrowly defined in these findings and recommendations; and Defendant Long Beach Mortgage Company be dismissed. Matter referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 20 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
September 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/26/16; DENYING 25 Motion for Default Judgment; SUBMITTED on the RECORD 20 Motion to Dismiss. ORDERING within twenty-eight (28) days of this order, plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default with the Clerk for defendant Long Beach Mortgage Company. Within twenty-eight (28) days after default has been entered, plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment in accordance with Rule 55(b)(2). Failure to file these pleadings will result in a recommendation that this defendant be dismissed from the action.(Washington, S)
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/16 ADOPTING in FULL 17 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Fair Trade Commission Act claim is dismissed without leave to amend. (Washington, S)
July 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/14/16 ORDERING that Real Time's 9 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART. The complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (but not including a FTC A ct claim) within 28 days; within 28 days of being served with the First Amended Complaint, defendant Real Time shall file a response; plaintiff's 16 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED as moot; within 28 days, plaintiff shall file a requ est for entry of default with the Clerk for defendant Long Beach Mortgage Company; within 28 days after default has been entered, plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment; failure to file these pleadings will result in a recommendation that this defendant be dismissed from the action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Fair Trade Commission Act claim be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; objections to these F&Rs due within 20 days. (Benson, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malifrando v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Malifrando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Represented By: Nathaniel Raymond Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Beach Mortgage Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?