Kersten v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al
| Kersten and Timothy A. Kersten |
| State of California Franchise Tax Board, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Dental Board of California, State of California Department of Motor Vehicles, Betty T. Yee, Jerome Horton, Michael Cohen, Selvi Stanislaus, John Chiang, Awet Kidane, Alexis Podesta, Spencer L. Walker, Steven G. Morrow, Judith Forsythe, Steven Afriat, Fran Burton, Stephen Casagrande, Yvette Chappel-Ingram, Katie Dawson, Luis R. Dominicis, Kathleen King, Ross Lai, Huong Le, Meredith McKenzie, Thomas Stewart, Bruce L. Whitcher, Debra Woo, Karen Fischer, Dawn Dill, Jean Shiomoto, David P. Harris and Fiona Ma |
| 2:2016cv00309 |
| February 16, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Craig M Kellison |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
JUDGMENT dated *3/22/2017* in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff pursuant to #24 Order Dismissing the First Amended Complaint signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/22/2017. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/22/2017 GRANTING #15 , #17 , Motions to Dismiss; DISMISSING the #12 First Amended Complaint, with prejudice, in its entirety. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
| Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER: The hearing on the motion(s) now calendared for February 21, 2017 is/are ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230 (g). If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
| Filing 22 REPLY IN SUPPORT by Defendants to #15 Motion to Dimiss. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Laura E. Robbins) (Robbins, Laura) Modified on 2/17/2017 (Reader, L). |
|
Filing 21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/8/2017 ORDERING that defendants State of California Franchise Tax Board, Dental Board of California and State of California Department of Motor Vehicles are DISMISSED from this case without prejudice. (Washington, S)
|
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION by Timothy A. Kersten to #15 Motion to Dimiss. (Wells, Kathleen) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Timothy A. Kersten. (Wells, Kathleen) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION: Motion Hearing on #17 Motion to Dismiss SET for 2/21/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. See #17 Motion to Dismiss. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 17 MOTION TO DISMISS by Luis R. Dominicis. Attorney Robbins, Laura E. ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Request For Judicial Notice, #2 Notice of Motion, #3 Proposed Order) (Robbins, Laura) |
| Filing 16 [DISREGARD - DUPLICATE OF #15 ] PROPOSED ORDER re #15 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robbins, Laura) Modified on 12/29/2016 (Benson, A). |
| Filing 15 MOTION to DISMISS by individual defendants. Attorney Robbins, Laura E. added. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Request For Judicial Notice)(Robbins, Laura) Modified on 12/29/2016 (Benson, A). |
| Filing 14 AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Steven Afriat, Fran Burton, California Department of Consumer Affairs, Stephen Casagrande, Yvette Chappel-Ingram, John Chiang, Michael Cohen, Katie Dawson, Dental Board of California, Dawn Dill, Luis R. Dominicis, Karen Fischer, Judith Forsythe, David P. Harris, Jerome Horton, Awet Kidane, Kathleen King, Ross Lai, Huong Le, Meredith McKenzie, Steven G. Morrow, Alexis Podesta, Jean Shiomoto, Selvi Stanislaus, State of California Department of Motor Vehicles, State of California Franchise Tax Board, Thomas Stewart, Spencer L. Walker, Bruce L. Whitcher, Debra Woo, Betty T. Yee* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kathleen Elizabeth Wells* *Law Office Of Kathleen Wells* *3393 Maplethorpe Lane* *Soquel, CA 95073*. (Benson, A) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Fiona Ma* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kathleen Elizabeth Wells* *Law Office of Kathleen Wells* *3393 Maplethorpe Lane* *Soquel, CA 95073*. (Jackson, T) |
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Timothy A. Kersten.(Wells, Kathleen) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/9/16 ORDERING that the time in which plaintiff may serve the summons and complaint on the defendants is hereby extended for 120 days to September 13, 2016. (Becknal, R)
|
| Filing 10 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Donati, J) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER re #6 Request for Extension to Serve Summons & Complaint by Timothy A. Kersten. (Wells, Kathleen) Modified on 6/9/2016 (Washington, S). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/18/16 ORDERING that, because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the matter is REFERRED BACK to the assigned District Judge. The 06/22/16 scheduling/status conference is VACATED. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/13/16. ADDED Attorney Kathleen E. Wells for Plaintiff Timothy A. Kersten.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Substitution of Attorney Order served on Timothy A. Kersten. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Serve Summons and Complaint by Timothy A. Kersten. Attorney Wells, Kathleen Elizabeth added. (Wells, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Timothy A. Kersten. (Wells, Kathleen) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of CASE ASSIGNMENT CORRECTION for #1 Complaint: Case erroneously assigned to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Action has been REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Kellison (plaintiff resides in Shasta County) (Marciel, M) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Steven Afriat; Fran Burton; California Department of Consumer Affairs; Stephen Casagrande; Yvette Chappel-Ingram; John Chiang; Michael Cohen; Katie Dawson; Dental Board of California; Dawn Dill; Luis R. Dominicis; Karen Fischer; Judith Forsythe; David P. Harris; Jerome E. Horton; Awet Kidane; Kathleen King; Ross Lai; Huong Le; Meredith McKenzie; Steven G. Morrow; Alexis Podesta; Jean Shiomoto; Selvi Stanislaus; State of California Department of Motor Vehicles; State of California Franchise Tax Board; Thomas Stewart; Spencer L. Walker; Bruce L. Witcher; Debra Woo; Betty T. Yee* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas A. Kersten, In Pro Per* *20484 Marquette Street* *Burney, CA 96013* (Marciel, M) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/22/2016 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marciel, M) |
| RECEIPT # CAE200072328 of $400.00 Civil Case Filing Fee paid by plaintiff Timothy A. Kersten on 2/16/2016. (Marciel, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Civil New Case Documents for JAM, #3 Summons, and 4 Clerk's Notice of Case Assigment Correction served on plaintiff Timothy A. Kersten. (Marciel, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against all defendants filed by plaintiff Timothy A. Kersten. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Marciel, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
