Howell v. Macomber, et al.
| Kareem J. Howell |
| J. Macomber, C. Cannedy, T. Snyder, D. Gonzales, M. Brady, D. Tran and C. Iobokwe |
| 2:2016cv00441 |
| March 2, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Francisco |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/17/19 ORDERING that within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiffs request 75 and inform the court of the status of the payment of the settlement proceeds. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/18 ORDERING On October 16, 2018, plaintiff filed a letter in the above-captioned cases addressed to the undersigned. While the court appreciates plaintiffs correspondence, it would not be a ppropriate to reassign his 2018 case to the undersigned. However, as the undersigned mentioned during the settlement conference in plaintiffs 2016 case, if all parties in plaintiffs 2018 case agree that a settlement conference is appropriate, the undersigned is amenable to presiding over a settlement conference in Case No. 2:18-cv-0513 CKD P. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/9/2018 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Kareem J. Howell at 1:30 p.m. on 10/9/2018 in Courtroom 25. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING 56 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/2018 DENYING Plaintiff's 50 MSJ and REFERRING this matter back to the Magistrate Judge for further scheduling. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
56
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/2018 RECOMMENDING 50 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and this matter be referred back to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for further scheduling. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/08/17 ordering plaintiff's renewed motion to extend discovery 40 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the 5/10/17 order 44 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to extend the pretrial motions deadline 46 is granted. The pretrial motions deadline is continued to 10/20/17. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER adopting in full 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/2/17. Plaintiff's 41 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/18/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 41 motion for temporary restraining order be denied without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/30/17. Added attorneys Dayton Van Vranken Longyear and Peter Zilaff for M. Brady, C. Iobokwe, and D. Tran.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/16 DENYING without prejudice 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/12/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's claims against defendants Warden Macomber, Facility Captain Cannedy, Facility Lt. Snyder, and Sgt. Gonzales are DISMISSED without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/21/16 ordering the clerk of the court shall return the copy of the complaint submitted by plaintiff on 4/13/16. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the 4 copies of the endorsed 03/02/16 complaint required to effect service. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Kareem J. Howell signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/4/2016. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/7/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk o f Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
