Biviescas v. Doane et al
Plaintiff: Carlos Biviescas
Defendant: Nick Doane and Garrett Hamilton
Case Number: 2:2016cv00451
Filed: March 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/31/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Reader, L)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/1/21 ORDERING that the Clerk appoint a district judge to this action. This actions has been RANDOMLY assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dis missed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Matter REFERRED to District Judge District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/26/2021 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall file a status report addressing the status of his criminal charges. (Yin, K)
April 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/11/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for judicial intervention in his ongoing criminal proceedings is DENIED; Plaintiff's request for money damages based on his false arrest claim is administratively STAYED pending the resolution of plaintiff's criminal charges; plaintiff shall notify the court within 30 days of the resolution of his criminal charges; The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this action.(Dillon, M)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/17/16 ORDERING that that the Sheriff of Yolo County or a designee shall collect from the prison trust account of Carlos Biviescas an initial partial filing fee and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiffs signed in forma pauperis affidavit on the Sheriff of Yolo County. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Biviescas v. Doane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Biviescas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick Doane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garrett Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?