June 9, 2023 |
Filing
119
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/7/23 DENYING 103 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, DENYING 104 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint, DENYING as MOOT 107 plaintiff's Mot ion for Relief from Judgment, DENYING 111 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions as Plaintiff fails to persuade the Court that Defendants engaged in misconduct warranting sanctions, and DENYING as MOOT 118 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. (Kastilahn, A)
|
March 31, 2023 |
Filing
101
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/23 ADOPTING in full 100 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 68 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's 81 motion to allow previously dismissed claims to proceed is construed as a motion for reconsideration and, so construed, is DENIED. The remaining pending motion 82 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
|
March 15, 2023 |
Filing
100
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 03/15/2023 RECOMMENDING that the 68 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, 81 Motion to Allow Previously Dismissed Claims to Proceed be construed as a Motion for Recons ideration and be denied as untimely, the 82 Request for Sanctions be denied as moot and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
|
February 8, 2023 |
Filing
99
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/07/23 DENYING 96 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 93 12/30/22 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Benson, A.)
|
December 30, 2022 |
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/29/22 DENYING 86 Motion to Strike. (Woodworth, M.)
|
November 15, 2022 |
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/14/22 GRANTING 79 Motion to file response. The Court will consider Plaintiff's 80 Response. (Woodworth, M.)
|
June 8, 2022 |
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/7/22 GRANTING 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file an opposition within 45 days from the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
|
April 12, 2022 |
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/12/22 GRANTING 66 Motion for Extension for Time. Dispositive motions are due on or before 05/16/22.(Licea Chavez, V)
|
February 11, 2022 |
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/11/2022 DENYING without prejudice 57 Motion to Sever. (Henshaw, R)
|
February 10, 2021 |
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/09/21 GRANTING 45 Motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference. The Court also orders that the parties may conduct any other depositions via videoconference without further leave of the Court provided that the depositions are properly noticed and comply in all other respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Plummer, M)
|
December 21, 2020 |
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/18/20 DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel and GRANTING 42 Motion for a modification of the discovery schedule. The parties may conduct discovery for an additional 30 days, until February 18, 2021. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed within 60 from this cutoff date. (Plummer, M)
|
August 20, 2020 |
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/18/2020 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' 33 motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (Zignago, K.)
|
July 22, 2020 |
Filing
36
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/22/2020 RECOMMENDING 33 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
December 2, 2019 |
Filing
28
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/19 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations. Claim 2 is DISMISSED, as asserted against Defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez. Claims 4, 5, and 6 are DISMISSED. Defendants Moore and R amirez are DISMISSED from this action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint under Claim 1 (against Defendants Macomber, Harrington, and Lockwood), Claim 2 (against Defendant David), and Claim 3 (against Defendants David, Stewart, Macomber, and Giannelli). (Kaminski, H)
|
September 24, 2019 |
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/24/2019 RECOMMENDING claim 2 against defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez be dismissed, claim 4, 5, and 6 be dismissed, and Moore and Ramirez be dismissed as defendants t o this action, which proceeds on plaintiffs second amended complaint against defendants Macomber, Harrington, Lockwood, David, Stewart, and Giannelli. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
July 10, 2019 |
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 07/09/19 ORDERING that plaintiff may file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
January 16, 2019 |
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/15/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
April 26, 2018 |
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING 1 Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
June 14, 2016 |
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Keenan Wilkins signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/14/2016. Plaintiff's 7 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory fili ng fee of $350.00. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|