Wilkins v. Macomber et al
Plaintiff: Keenan Wilkins
Defendant: Jeff Macomber, Kelly Harrington and Timothy M. Lockwood
Case Number: 2:2016cv00475
Filed: March 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/7/23 DENYING 103 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, DENYING 104 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint, DENYING as MOOT 107 plaintiff's Mot ion for Relief from Judgment, DENYING 111 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions as Plaintiff fails to persuade the Court that Defendants engaged in misconduct warranting sanctions, and DENYING as MOOT 118 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. (Kastilahn, A)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/23 ADOPTING in full 100 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 68 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's 81 motion to allow previously dismissed claims to proceed is construed as a motion for reconsideration and, so construed, is DENIED. The remaining pending motion 82 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 100 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 03/15/2023 RECOMMENDING that the 68 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, 81 Motion to Allow Previously Dismissed Claims to Proceed be construed as a Motion for Recons ideration and be denied as untimely, the 82 Request for Sanctions be denied as moot and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/07/23 DENYING 96 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 93 12/30/22 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Benson, A.)
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/29/22 DENYING 86 Motion to Strike. (Woodworth, M.)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/14/22 GRANTING 79 Motion to file response. The Court will consider Plaintiff's 80 Response. (Woodworth, M.)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/7/22 GRANTING 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file an opposition within 45 days from the date of this order. (Kaminski, H)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/12/22 GRANTING 66 Motion for Extension for Time. Dispositive motions are due on or before 05/16/22.(Licea Chavez, V)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/11/2022 DENYING without prejudice 57 Motion to Sever. (Henshaw, R)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/09/21 GRANTING 45 Motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference. The Court also orders that the parties may conduct any other depositions via videoconference without further leave of the Court provided that the depositions are properly noticed and comply in all other respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Plummer, M)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/18/20 DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel and GRANTING 42 Motion for a modification of the discovery schedule. The parties may conduct discovery for an additional 30 days, until February 18, 2021. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed within 60 from this cutoff date. (Plummer, M)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/18/2020 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' 33 motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (Zignago, K.)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/22/2020 RECOMMENDING 33 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/19 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations. Claim 2 is DISMISSED, as asserted against Defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez. Claims 4, 5, and 6 are DISMISSED. Defendants Moore and R amirez are DISMISSED from this action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint under Claim 1 (against Defendants Macomber, Harrington, and Lockwood), Claim 2 (against Defendant David), and Claim 3 (against Defendants David, Stewart, Macomber, and Giannelli). (Kaminski, H)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/24/2019 RECOMMENDING claim 2 against defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez be dismissed, claim 4, 5, and 6 be dismissed, and Moore and Ramirez be dismissed as defendants t o this action, which proceeds on plaintiffs second amended complaint against defendants Macomber, Harrington, Lockwood, David, Stewart, and Giannelli. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 07/09/19 ORDERING that plaintiff may file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/15/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING 1 Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Keenan Wilkins signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/14/2016. Plaintiff's 7 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory fili ng fee of $350.00. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilkins v. Macomber et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keenan Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Macomber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Harrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy M. Lockwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?