Wilkins v. Macomber et al
Keenan Wilkins |
Jeff Macomber, Kelly Harrington and Timothy M. Lockwood |
2:2016cv00475 |
March 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Troy L. Nunley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/7/23 DENYING 103 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, DENYING 104 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint, DENYING as MOOT 107 plaintiff's Mot ion for Relief from Judgment, DENYING 111 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions as Plaintiff fails to persuade the Court that Defendants engaged in misconduct warranting sanctions, and DENYING as MOOT 118 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 101 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/23 ADOPTING in full 100 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 68 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's 81 motion to allow previously dismissed claims to proceed is construed as a motion for reconsideration and, so construed, is DENIED. The remaining pending motion 82 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 100 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 03/15/2023 RECOMMENDING that the 68 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, 81 Motion to Allow Previously Dismissed Claims to Proceed be construed as a Motion for Recons ideration and be denied as untimely, the 82 Request for Sanctions be denied as moot and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.) |
Filing 99 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/07/23 DENYING 96 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 93 12/30/22 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/29/22 DENYING 86 Motion to Strike. (Woodworth, M.) |
Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/14/22 GRANTING 79 Motion to file response. The Court will consider Plaintiff's 80 Response. (Woodworth, M.) |
Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/7/22 GRANTING 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file an opposition within 45 days from the date of this order. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/12/22 GRANTING 66 Motion for Extension for Time. Dispositive motions are due on or before 05/16/22.(Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/11/2022 DENYING without prejudice 57 Motion to Sever. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/09/21 GRANTING 45 Motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference. The Court also orders that the parties may conduct any other depositions via videoconference without further leave of the Court provided that the depositions are properly noticed and comply in all other respects with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/18/20 DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel and GRANTING 42 Motion for a modification of the discovery schedule. The parties may conduct discovery for an additional 30 days, until February 18, 2021. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed within 60 from this cutoff date. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/18/2020 ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' 33 motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/22/2020 RECOMMENDING 33 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/2/19 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations. Claim 2 is DISMISSED, as asserted against Defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez. Claims 4, 5, and 6 are DISMISSED. Defendants Moore and R amirez are DISMISSED from this action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint under Claim 1 (against Defendants Macomber, Harrington, and Lockwood), Claim 2 (against Defendant David), and Claim 3 (against Defendants David, Stewart, Macomber, and Giannelli). (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/24/2019 RECOMMENDING claim 2 against defendants Macomber, Moore, and Ramirez be dismissed, claim 4, 5, and 6 be dismissed, and Moore and Ramirez be dismissed as defendants t o this action, which proceeds on plaintiffs second amended complaint against defendants Macomber, Harrington, Lockwood, David, Stewart, and Giannelli. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 07/09/19 ORDERING that plaintiff may file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/15/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING 1 Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Keenan Wilkins signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/14/2016. Plaintiff's 7 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory fili ng fee of $350.00. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.