Cruz v. State of California
| Thomas Cruz |
| State of California |
| 2:2016cv00498 |
| March 9, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| Allison Claire |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/20/18 DENYING 33 Motion for Reconsideration. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/16/2017 GRANTING 27 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's objections to 26 F&R due by 9/18/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/28/17 recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/20/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 19 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 16 Motion to Stay; GRANTING IN PART 11 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Grounds One, Two, Three, and Five of the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as unexhausted; DIRECTING the respondent to file a response to the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, addressing Ground Four, within sixty days; DIRECTING the petitioner to file a reply, if any, within thirty days after service of the respondent's Answer; DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/22/2017 RECOMMENDING petitioner's 16 motion for a stay be denied; respondent's 11 motion to dismiss be granted in part; the following claims and any include d sub-claims, as to Grounds One, Two, Three and Five, be dismissed as unexhausted; respondent be directed to file a repsonse to petitioner's habeas petition addressing the remaining, properly exhausted claim (Ground Four) within 60 days of any o rder adopting these findings and recommendations; and petitioner be directed file a reply, if any, within 30 days after service of the answer. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 10 days. Due to the exigencies in the court's calendar, no extensions of time will be granted.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/17/17 ordering respondent is hereby directed to file an opposition or a notice of non-opposition to petitioner's stay and abeyance motion within 21 days from the date of this order. Petition er's reply, if any, is due 7 days thereafter. If petitioner exhausts any claims in the California Supreme Court prior to this court's resolution of the pending motion, petitioner shall file a notice of exhaustion in this court. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/17/2016 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's 14 request for appointment of counsel. Within 28 days, petitioner shall respond to this order, addressing how he wishes to proceed as to hi s unexhausted claims. If petitioner seeks a stay, within 28 days, he shall file a motion for a stay in accordance with this order. If petitioner does not notify the court of how he would like to proceed, the undersigned will recommend dismissal of Grounds One, Two, Three, and Five and that the case proceed on Ground Four without a stay. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/5/2016 ORDERING within 30 days, petitioner shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondent's 11 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/04/16 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cruz v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Cruz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
