Golden v. State Military Department National Guard, State of California, et al
| Michelle Golden |
| State Military Department National Guard, State of California, Richard Rabe, Charlotte Clark and Rebecca Lorera |
| 2:2016cv00507 |
| March 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/15/17, ORDERING that because CMD is the only defendant in this suit, and because CMD's alleged liability derives solely from plaintiff's vicarious liability theory, defendant's 40 motion to dismiss is GRANTED without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
32
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/16: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/2/2017. Discovery due by 11/1/2016. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 2/9/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/15/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 7/30/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/01/16 ORDERING that the 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with 21 days LEAVE TO AMEND. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/26/2016 ORDERING that the 14 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. According to the parties' 20 stipulation the motion to dismiss is WITHDRAWN. The remaining defendants shall respond to the complaint within twenty-one (21) days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/14/16. The United States is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice. Considering the case now involves a state law claim against state law defendants, defendants are hereby ordered to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of jurisdiction. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
