Eckstrom v. Hoshino
| Carl Eckstrom |
| Martin Hoshino |
| 2:2016cv00538 |
| March 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/27/2020 GRANTING 37 Motion for Extension of Time and DENYING 39 Motion for Reconsideration. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/23/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 26 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 23 Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, without leave to amend, for failure to state a cognizable claim. DENYING 31 Motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. DENIED as MOOT 33 Motion for Ruling, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/24/2018 RECOMMENDING 23 Second Amended Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a cognizable claim and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/25/2017 GRANTING 21 Request. Plaintiff has 45 days from the date this order is served to file his amended complaint. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/05/17 ORDERING the amended complaint 17 is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff's motion for the court to consider exhibits 19 is DENIED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/28/17 GRANTING 14 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date thisorder is served to file his amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/31/17 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Carl Eckstrom and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eckstrom v. Hoshino | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Eckstrom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin Hoshino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
