Schrupp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al.
| Paul Schrupp |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and NDEX WEST, L.L.C. |
| 2:2016cv00636 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| William B. Shubb |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/12/2020 VACATING the 5/18/2020 73 Motion for Attorney Fees Hearing and WITHDRAWING the motion. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/20/2018: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Request for Consideration 71 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees 73 be, and the same hereby is, STAYED pending resolution of the appeal. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/15/2018 DENYING 55 Motion to Amend, GRANTING 51 Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING 52 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/8/2018 ORDERING Stipulated protective APPROVED; Amendments and Clarifications: The parties shall comply with the provisions and procedures of Local Rules 140 and 141 with respect to s ealing or redaction requests; Prior to filing any motion related to this stipulated protective order or other discovery motion, the parties shall first exhaust informal meet-and-confer efforts and otherwise comply with Local Rule 251; Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of this stipulated protective order after the action is terminated. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATION and ORDER continuing dates 47 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/1/2018: 1) The last day to file dispositive motions shall be 4/13/2018; 2) The Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 6/4/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; and 3) The Jury Trial is reset for 8/21/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER re DISCOVERY signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/18. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/14/18 ORDERING that no later than 2/19/2018, defendant's counsel shall confer with his client, and communicate with Plaintiff, regarding the existence of a written policy or procedure. The F2/12/18 Discovery completion deadline is EXTENDED for the limited purpose of conducting the above-mentioned discovery activities only. All other scheduling deadlines remain unchanged, subject to any modification by the district judge. Plaintiff's ex parte application for a general extension of the discovery completion deadline 39 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/5/18 DENYING 33 Motion to Compel and VACATING February 8, 2018 hearing. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue dates 31 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/22/2017: 1) Discovery Cut-Off shall be 2/12/2018; 2) Dispositive Motion filing deadline shall be 3/2/2018; 3) Final Pretrial Conference is reset for 4/23/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; 4) Jury Trial is continued to 6/19/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2017 ORDERING that the discovery cut-off is CONTINUED to 1/8/2018. The deadline to file dispositive motions is CONTINUED to 1/26/2018. All other deadlines remain unchanged. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/9/2016 DISMISSING in its entirety this action, and each and every claim asserted in this action against NDEX WEST. The dismissal is with prejudice; and each of the Parties is to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER 19 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/28/2016 resetting the Scheduling Conference for 10/11/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A Joint Status Report shall be filed by 9/27/2016. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM and ORDER RE 6 Motion to Dismiss signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/13/2016: IT IS ORDERED that Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss plaintiff's Complaint 6 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that NDEX West, LLC's motion to dismiss plaintiff's wrongful foreclosure claim against it 7 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiff has twenty days from the date this Order is signed to file a First Amended Complaint setting forth a wrongful foreclosure claim against NDEX, West, LLC, if he can do so consistent with this Order.(Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/05/16 ORDERING that defendant's 9 Request to Appear Telephonically at the 06/13/16 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; the courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Benson, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
