Nails v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
Angela Nails |
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. |
2:2016cv00688 |
March 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/20/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed and the clerk be directed to close the case. Objections due within 14 days of the date of this order. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Donati, J) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/1/2017 GRANTING 25 Motion Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Washington, S) |
Filing 23 ORDER adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 3 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/7/17: Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 22 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/20/16 ORDERING that the 13 06/22/16 OSC is DISCHARGED and no sanctions are imposed; the 01/18/17 Status Conference is VACATED; and the 21 Motion to Appear Telephonically at the Status Conference is DENIED AS MOOT; and RECOMMENDING that the 3 Motion to Dismiss be granted; referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A) |
Filing 13 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/22/16 ORDERING that the hearing on defendants motion to dismiss (ECF No. 3 ) is CONTINUED to July 20, 2016. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than July 6, 2016, w hy sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than July 6, 201 6. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before July 13, 2016. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at the followingaddresses: a. 22435 Dix Toledo Road, Unit 1,Brownstown, MI 48183; andb. 15406 Bellaire Ave., Apt. M, Grandview, MO 64030.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nails v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Frederick J. Ufkes |
Represented By: | Susan T. Ye |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Angela Nails | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.