Mitchell v. Duffy et al
Plaintiff: Paul - Mitchell
Defendant: Brian Duffy, Avalos, Pongyang and Ladson
Case Number: 2:2016cv00703
Filed: April 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/07/19 ORDERING that plaintiffs request for a certificate of appealability 44 is construed as a notice of appeal of the June 11, 2019 Order and Judgment 42 , 43 ), and the Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. (Plummer, M)
April 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/04/19 DENYING 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Also, RECOMMENDING that the second amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2019 GRANTING 32 Request for Copy of Amended Complaint; DIRECTING Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff copy of 31 First Amended Complaint; and ORDERING Plaintiff to file either the missing 2 pages, including his signature, or a complete, signed copy of the First Amended Complaint within 21 days of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/2019 GRANTING 28 Motion for Extension of Time. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint. (Huang, H)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/28/2018 DISMISSING 24 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Huang, H)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2018 DENYING 22 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the service of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/30/18 DENYING 17 motion for the appointment of counsel and GRANTING 18 motion for extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from service of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/27/2018 DENYING 15 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel and GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Paul Mitchell signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/11/18. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/08/16 denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Within 30 days of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the completed application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner that he receives from the court so that the court may obtain a certified copy of his trust account statement. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Duffy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul - Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Duffy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pongyang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ladson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?