Freeman v. Lynch et al
Plaintiff: Travon Leon Freeman
Defendant: E. Lynch and M. Linggi
Case Number: 2:2016cv00705
Filed: April 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER DENYING 85 Motion for TRO signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/04/2019. (Gonzales, V)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/19/2019 ADOPTING 78 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING, for failure to state a claim, Defendant M. Linggi, and GRANTING Defendant E. Lynch's 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 78 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 09/04/19 RECOMMENDING that defendant Linggi be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and defendant Lynchs motion for summary judgment 68 be granted. Motion for Summary Judgment 68 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/27/2019 DENYING 60 Motion for Referral to Settlement Conference or Mediation. (Henshaw, R)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/5/2019 STRIKING plaintiff's 59 and 62 motions, as improperly filed discovery requests and DENYING plaintiff's 65 motion for sanctions. Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's 60 motion for referral of this case to mediation or a settlement conference within 20 days. (Yin, K)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/24/2018 ORDERING that the stay of discovery is hereby lifted; the parties may conduct discovery until 3/11/2019; all dispositive motions shall be filed within 90 days after the close of discovery; and except as provided herein, the provisions of the court's 16 Order shall apply. (Huang, H)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/16/18 ADOPTING in full 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' 17 motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 23 , 26 , and 43 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 21 and 25 ) are DENIED without prejudice to renewal following the close of discovery. (Kastilahn, A)
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/11/18 RECOMMENDING defendants motion to revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis status 17 be denied. Plaintiffs motions for injunctive relief 23 , 26 and 43 ) be denie d. Plaintiffs motions for summary judgment 21 and 25 be denied without prejudice to renewal following the close of discovery. Motions 17 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 and 43 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/30/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 24 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
November 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/08/17 GRANTING 19 Motion to modify the scheduling order to stay discovery. Discovery in this action is stayed pending the resolution of defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. (Plummer, M)
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/18/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 11 motion for default judgment. (Yin, K)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Travon Leon Freeman signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/14/2016. Plaintiff's 2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory fi ling fee of $350.00. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freeman v. Lynch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travon Leon Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Linggi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?