Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
Brittany S.M. Taylor |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2016cv00747 |
April 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Craig M. Kellison |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/22/17, ORDERING that Plaintiff's 18 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's 21 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/14/17 ORDERING that the time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 05/17/17. (Benson, A) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/1/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to and including 3/15/2017, in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to 4/14/2017 to file her opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 5/4/2017. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/10/2017 ORDERING Dispositive Motions filed by 2/10/2017; Defendant's Opposition/Cross Motion due by 3/13/2017; and Plaintiff's Reply due by 4/3/2017.(Reader, L) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/27/2016 ORDERING that plaintiff may have an extension of time to11/28/2016 in which to file Plaintiffs Motion for SummaryJudgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to 12/28/2016 to file her opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will bedue 01/17/2017. (Butolph, J) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/11/16. The Clerk is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brittany S.M. Taylor | |
Represented By: | Steven Gilbert Rosales |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Marcelo N. Illarmo |
Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.