Kirker-Felo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sherry Ann Kirker-Felo
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2016cv00880
Filed: April 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/21/2018 GRANTING 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Washington, S)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/19/2017 ORDERING that within 14 days of this order, defendant shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order resolving 26 Motion for Attorney Fees, or (2) an opposition in response to the motion. (Washington, S)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/2/17 ORDERING that this Action is REMANDED to The Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/17 ORDERING that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading is EXTENDED until 3/10/2017. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/2017 ORDERING that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading is EXTENDED until 2/24/2017. (Zignago, K.)
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/5/2017 GRANTING Defendant until 2/10/2017 to file her responsive pleading. (Donati, J)
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/17/16 ORDERING that the deadline for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment in this action is extended through 12/1/2016. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is extended through 1/20/2017. All other aspects of the Scheduling Order previously issued in this action remain unchanged. (Kastilahn, A)
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/17/16 ORDERING that the time for Plaintiff to file his Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand is EXTENDED to 11/17/16. (Benson, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirker-Felo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Ann Kirker-Felo
Represented By: Jared Thomas Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Donna Wade Anderson
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?