Spencer v. Virga et al
| Thurman Leroy Spencer |
| Timothy Virga, Euraka Daye and B. Brizendine |
| 2:2016cv00886 |
| April 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kern |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/2021 INFORMING Plaintiff that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and ORDERING Clerk to terminate 57 Request. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/8/2018 ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DENYING 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/23/18 GRANTING 45 Motion for Extension. Plaintiff has 60 days from the date this order is served to file his objections. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
44
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/15/18, GRANTING 42 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his objections and an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/31/2018 GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his objections. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/02/18 DENYING 28 , 29 plaintiff's motions for extension of time. Plaintiff's amended complaint 30 is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days of the date this order is served. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 22 be denied. MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/2017 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 13 Motion for Injunctive Relief. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Thurman Leroy Spencer signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/3/2017. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forw ard to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/2/16 ORDERING that plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the required trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may result dismissal of this case. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
