Washington v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review et al
| Melissa Washington |
| Office of Disability Adjudication and Review and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2016cv00925 |
| May 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Health Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/02/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 23 26 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED; Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/4/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment that complies with the scheduling order no later than 2/10/2017. Failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed without prejudice. The time for filing opposition and reply shall be adjusted accordingly. The Clerk of Court is directed to re-serve a copy of the 6 scheduling order on plaintiff. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/1/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff has filed a supplemental statement in response to the order to show cause. The order to show cause was discharged and plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's statement is insufficient as a motion for summary judgment. While the court looks at the entirety of the administrative record in reviewing plaintiff's challenge to the Commission er's decision, it is incumbent on plaintiff to set forth what errors she believes were committed by the Administrative Law Judge in reaching the determination of nondisability. Plaintiff is therefore reminded that her motion for summary judgment must be filed no later than December 9, 2016. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/8/2016 DISCHARGING 18 Order to Show Cause; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 12/9/2016; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that a failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; ORDERING that the time to file an opposition and reply be adjusted accordingly. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/19/16 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause, in writing, no later than fourteen days from the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/16/16 ORDERING the Clerk to serve plaintiff with a copy of the Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment form and the plaintiff shall file said form by 08/29/16. Plaintiff is reminded that under the scheduling order, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment must be filed within 45 days of the lodging of the administrative transcript. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/5/2016 GRANTING 3 Plaintiff's Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases; the Cler k of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
