Barnes v. Barnes et al
Danny Charles Barnes |
Danny Charles Barnes, Long Beach, CA, Long Beach Superior Court and California State Prison, Sacramento |
2:2016cv00948 |
May 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/11/16 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign this case to a United States District Judge. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/02/16 ordering plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the requiredtrust account statement. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In FormaPauperis by a Prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/17/2016 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp form. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/5/2016. (Sant Agata, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.