Johnson v. Kumar et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Krishna G. Kumar and Nalini K. Kumar |
| 2:2016cv00978 |
| May 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/17, GRANTING plaintiff's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants are enjoined to "alter facilities to make such facilities readily accessible to and useable by individuals with disabilities" to the extent required by the ADA. 42 U.S.C. § 12188(a)(2). The Court also AWARDS plaintiff statutory damages in the amount of $8,000. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/20/2017 DENYING 19 Motion to Compel without prejudice to renewal; VACATING the hearing on said motion set for 9/22/2017. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/5/2017 GRANTING 19 Motion to Compel. Within twenty-one days of the 9/1/2017 hearing defendants shall produce to plaintiff the requested discovery; and Within twenty-one days of the 9/1/2017 defendants' attorney, Bruce A. Neilson, shall pay plaintiff $1,200 in sanctions. (Washington, S) Modified on 9/6/2017 (Washington, S).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
