Lawson v. California Service Company et al
KaShonda Lawson |
California Service Company, Paul Vitelli, Sherri Gebhart and Susie Hudson |
2:2016cv00990 |
May 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/16/2017 ORDERING this case DISMISSED with prejudice and with each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/18/17 ORDERING that the deadline to complete discovery in this matter is CONTINUED to 11/11/17. The new deadline to complete discovery shall be used as the date by which to calculate all deadlines set in the initial order by reference to the discovery cutoff date (e.g. deadline for disclosure of experts, deadline to file dispositive motions, deadline to file Notice of Trial Readiness).(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/17/2016 ORDERING that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED through and including 9/26/2016. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.