Erhardt v. Fisher
Petitioner: Fritz Alfred Erhardt
Respondent: Raythel Fisher, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2016cv01002
Filed: May 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Madera
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/01/19 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/31/2017 GRANTING 17 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent's response to the petition due on or before 6/29/2017. (Henshaw, R)
March 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 15 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 13 Motion to Dismiss; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to strike the petitioner's fourth ground from the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDERING the respondent to file a responsive pleading to grounds one through three of said petition within sixty days. (Michel, G.)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/17 ORDERING that the order to show cause (ECF No. 14 ) is DISCHARGED; and it is RECOMMENDED that: Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) be granted ; The Clerk of the Court be directed to strike petitioner's fourth ground from the petition (ECF No. 1 at 10, 24); and respondent be ordered to file a responsive pleading to grounds one through three of the petition within sixty days from any order by the district court adopting these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/16/2016 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 30 days, why his failure to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the gra nting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in an order striking the unexhausted claim four, and proceeding on exhausted claims one through three. (Yin, K)
May 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/19/16 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner page 16 from the AO-241 form petition for writ of habeas corpus (revised 1/15) from the J-Net. Within 14 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall submit a signed signature page to be added to the petition. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erhardt v. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Fritz Alfred Erhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raythel Fisher, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?